<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Philippians 2:6: Is Jesus Equal to the Father?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://historicalfaith.org/philippians-26-the-trinity-and-equality-with-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://historicalfaith.org</link>
	<description>God's Word is Truth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 23:10:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: JC		</title>
		<link>https://historicalfaith.org/philippians-26-the-trinity-and-equality-with-god/#comment-1409</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2022 05:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trinityexamined.com/?page_id=990#comment-1409</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Further to state with regard to NKJV and KJV bibles of 1600’s are written to promote the trinity, even if the writers insert fraudulent passages that don’t exist like 1 John 5:7. Why would the set apart insert fraudulent passages that did not exist in earlier translations? Who does this?
You know them by their fruits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to state with regard to NKJV and KJV bibles of 1600’s are written to promote the trinity, even if the writers insert fraudulent passages that don’t exist like 1 John 5:7. Why would the set apart insert fraudulent passages that did not exist in earlier translations? Who does this?<br />
You know them by their fruits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CJ		</title>
		<link>https://historicalfaith.org/philippians-26-the-trinity-and-equality-with-god/#comment-1408</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2022 05:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trinityexamined.com/?page_id=990#comment-1408</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://historicalfaith.org/philippians-26-the-trinity-and-equality-with-god/#comment-573&quot;&gt;phillip&lt;/a&gt;.

Form “of” God, Son “of”God, Holy Spirit “of” God. “Of” means from. The term “form of God” does not mean God, it means “from God”. If this term meant God, you would not write “form of God”. Yeshua is the “form of 
Yahweh”, which isn’t Yahweh. Yeshua is a reflection of Yahweh, Yahweh reflects no one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://historicalfaith.org/philippians-26-the-trinity-and-equality-with-god/#comment-573">phillip</a>.</p>
<p>Form “of” God, Son “of”God, Holy Spirit “of” God. “Of” means from. The term “form of God” does not mean God, it means “from God”. If this term meant God, you would not write “form of God”. Yeshua is the “form of<br />
Yahweh”, which isn’t Yahweh. Yeshua is a reflection of Yahweh, Yahweh reflects no one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: phillip		</title>
		<link>https://historicalfaith.org/philippians-26-the-trinity-and-equality-with-god/#comment-573</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phillip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 10:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trinityexamined.com/?page_id=990#comment-573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It seems obvious to me that Paul is firstly talking about the actual person of Jesus Christ during his ministry, so even allowing the use of was has credence it is obviously in the past from Paul&#039;s perspective as he never knew the earthly Jesus. To seize equality with God is surely what any of us do when we act without reference to God as our Master, something scripture is insistent Jesus never did. Gethsemane being his last temptation with the Cross its overcoming and his resurrection the reality of God highly exalting him.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems obvious to me that Paul is firstly talking about the actual person of Jesus Christ during his ministry, so even allowing the use of was has credence it is obviously in the past from Paul&#8217;s perspective as he never knew the earthly Jesus. To seize equality with God is surely what any of us do when we act without reference to God as our Master, something scripture is insistent Jesus never did. Gethsemane being his last temptation with the Cross its overcoming and his resurrection the reality of God highly exalting him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
