Actually it’s very very poor argumented opinion.
First you have several variants of Septuagint and guess what in most of them which Orogen took from the Kews variant about Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace and Mighty God are more or less present.
Second Angelos (Messenger or Malak on Hebrew) in one of LXX variants is refering to a Angel of the Exodus which Jewish Targums refering that was Word-Memra -Son of God throughout God Created everything.
(Targums use different word-Pihtama to refer when God is just talking or giving Decree but Memra is God’s Word through out God Created everything and which represent God on Earth (not always but very often)
So Messiah will be Memra-Word-Son of God throughout God Created everything just like Gospel of John said and guess what Targum Neofiti said the same in the first line:
https://archive.org/details/neofiti1genesis

Those are separate prophecies. In chapter 7 Isaiah is prophesying to Ahaz, assuring him that king Pekah of Israel and king Rezin of Syria (who had joined forced against Ahaz) will not prevail against him.

Ahaz was an atrocious ruler who sealed off the temple and shut the doors to the Torah schools. He indentured Judah to Assyria.

By the end of 8 Isiah is telling us of the tremendous oppression the citizens of Judah are suffering under the hand of Assyria (Which Ahaz has brought upon them).

“And the one who passes therein shall suffer hardships and hunger, and it shall come to pass, when he is hungry and wroth, that he shall curse his king and his god and face upwards.

And he shall look to the land, and behold, distress and darkness, weariness of oppression, and to the darkness he is lost.”

Chapter 9 then begins, “The people who walked in darkness, have seen a great light; those who dwell in the land of the shadow of death, light shone upon them.”

2 Kings chapter 18 tells us that Hezekiah “rebelled against the king of Assyria and did not serve him.” He destroyed the high places (to idols) that his father had established and turned the nation back toward GOD. This light that has shone is clearly the dawning of Hezekiah’s reign.

Thank you so very much.

Thanks for your comment and insights. The heresy card is a last ditch effort by Trinitarian apologists to keep people in Trinitarian prison. May God bless your truth pursuits.

I don’t want to say much, but you just called respected (trinitarian) scholars like, Strongs, Brown, Driver, Briggs and many bible translators and two prominent persons in the bible, as well as some prophets, liars. Here’s what they say about el…

Strong’s #410: ‘el (pronounced ale)

shortened from 352; strength; as adjective, mighty; especially the Almighty (but used also of any deity):–God (god), X goodly, X great, idol, might(-y one), power, strong. Compare names in “-el.”

Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew Lexicon:

‘êl

1) god, god-like one, mighty one

1a) mighty men, men of rank, mighty heroes

1b) angels

1c) god, false god, (demons, imaginations)

1d) God, the one true God, Jehovah

2) mighty things in nature

3) strength, power

Even worse… you are calling Moses a liar, since he uses el not only for God in Exodus 15:11, Exodus 34:14, Deuteronomy 28:32, Deuteronomy 32:12. What about David, he uses the word el for others in Psalm 29:1 (ESV) and in Psalm 36:6. And what about Psalm 82:1? God stands in the congregation of the mighty – KJV (or divine beings depending on the translation you use).

Even if you want to disregard all of these, you really have to take a look at Ezekiel 32:21. If El Gibbor means Mighty God as you claim, then we have a huge issue now… then El Gibbor – Mighty God – is now laying with the uncircumcised in hell. O boy, we can’t have that now can we? God is condemned to hell according to you since that’s where el gibbor are. Not how el gibbor is translated in Ezekiel 32:21 and it can only be transalted as that, mighty men, strong men, mighty warriors.

As a side note, as far as I know, El Gibbor is only found twice in the bible. Gibbor El is, as far as I know, also found twice, which is translated mighty God. One could make the case that if El is before Gibbor, it’s mighty man/men and if Gibbor is before El, it’s Mighty God. That makes Jesus a mighty man of God and not a mighty God, a title that’s preserved for the one and only true God, the Father.

While I’ve gone to church for many years now, I always wondered about the trinity. Why is the one of the major doctrines of the church (yes, I’m calling it the church, not christianity, since the church has doctrines and demands church followers to keep them – while being a christian is all about worshipping God and following Jesus the Messiah in day to day life – and not keeping a set of men written rules) not outright in the bible? Why does it need to be, as many church doctrines, pieced together from scriptures taken all over the place? If it is a simple truth, it should simple be stated outright. The older I get, the more I struggle with the trinity, simply because the outright texts in the bible state something else. Jesus in various places calls God his God. Paul is very clear: But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him. John is clear: Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, AND Jesus Christ, whom you have sent. There is only God and Jesus isn’t Him according to the outright texts. Yet the church explains these texts away and sticks to their own doctrine about a triune god. In my surroundings it’s hard to confess these things and it causes lots of issues, since my wife is very into the trinity and praying/talking to the Holy Spirit and such.

While I’m still looking at all of it and seeing more and more that clear evidence points towards Jesus not being part of God, but a man appointed by God, I still struggle with Isaiah 9:6. That’s how I came across this website. I’ll be reading here more in the coming weeks. Just before coming here, a thought came to me, how does the Jewish bible translate this verse? So, I looked it up…. “For a child has been born to us, a son given to us, and the authority is upon his shoulder, and the wondrous adviser, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, called his name, “the prince of peace.” The notes on the verse then say this: The Holy One, blessed be He, Who gives wondrous counsel, is a mighty God and an everlasting Father, called Hezekiah’s name, “the prince of peace,” since peace and truth will be in his days. Quite interesting read.

Then I’m reading Omniscient’s replies. Throwing that famous heretic card into the discussion. As soon as people start doing that, I learned over the years that I might actually be unto something, getting closer to the truth.

Thank you for this article, it helps me on the way to discover the truth of Gods Word, instead of men’s thoughts about it.

I’m sorry –I don’t know what article you are referencing.

Hi Sir, can you please give your article about Isaiah 9:6 about the past events? I want to learn that one.

I quote you directly “Mighty God is a mistranslation. It should read “mighty man of God” or “mighty hero.” This is a bare faced lie. The verse reads El Gibbor in Hebrew. El means God, Gibbor means might/strength. El Gibbor literally means Strong God or Mighty God. The same word is used by Isaiah in Isaiah 10:21 to refer to God himself “A remnant of Jacob shall return to El Gibbor ‘Mighty God’. Stop lying and repent.

Your next lie and I quote you directly again “Everlasting Father is a mistranslation. It should read: “father of the ages.” This is another bare faced lie. The verse reads AviAd in Hebrew. Avi means Father, while AD means Perpetual, Eternal, Everlasting, Forever etc. The same word AD is used by Isaiah in Isaiah 57:15 to refer to God himself “For thus saith the high and lofty One that inhabiteth “AD” eternity”.

The child that is born is the Mighty God and Eternal Father. Repent and give up your heresy.

Many prophecies have been written in the past tense, as though they already took place. This is typical of YHWH’s foreknowledge. He sees events in the future as a done deal….as though they already happened.

For Example, in Revelation we read Jesus was crucified before the foundation of the world, yet Jesus would not be born for thousands of years after the earth was made.

Another example if the glory YHWH had prepared for Jesus in advance of his existence and resurrection (John 17:5). Reading on to verse 24 we discover Jesus was not asking for a glory he had in another existence with YHWH, but rather he is asking for the preordained glory God prepared for him. When we are resurrected we will get that same glory. We have not got it yet, but Jesus says he has given us the same glory that His Father gave him. This is how the prophetic perfect tense works.

I suggest everyone examine the REV Bible Commentary.
https://www.revisedenglishversion.com/Isaiah/chapter9/6